Portuguese Banks Close Accounts of Crypto Exchanges, Media Reveals – Finance Bitcoin News

Ledger
Portuguese Banks Close Accounts of Crypto Exchanges, Media Reveal
Blockonomics


Major Portuguese banks have started closing or refusing to open accounts for cryptocurrency platforms such as exchanges, according to media reports. The move threatens to tarnish the country’s image as one of Europe’s most crypto-friendly destinations, a haven for bitcoin enthusiasts.

Portuguese Crypto Firms Hit by Bank Account Closures

Portugal, a leading European crypto hub, is risking the loss of its attractiveness for crypto businesses and talent working in the industry as some of its largest banks are now closing accounts of companies operating with digital currencies.

Last week, the nation’s biggest listed bank, Banco Comercial Portugues, and another major institution, Banco Santander, shut down all the accounts of Lisbon-based Criptoloja, Bloomberg reported, quoting the exchange’s co-founder and CEO Pedro Borges. The development follows the decision of two smaller banks to close the platform’s accounts.

No official explanation was provided in either of these cases, the crypto entrepreneur emphasized. Meanwhile, the state-owned bank Caixa Geral de Depositos and the Lisbon-based BiG have also started rejecting or closing down crypto exchange accounts, Jornal de Negocios unveiled this week.

Tokenmetrics

At least two other crypto brokers have been hit by bank account closures this year, the report notes. Mind the Coin has been unable to open an account for months, and rival Luso Digital Assets had some of its accounts closed down, its executives complained.

Portugal’s Crypto Businesses Forced to Open Accounts Outside Country

Anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules are often the main reasons cited by lenders who refuse to work with crypto companies. Banco Comercial explained that it’s obliged to report suspicious transactions which may lead to termination of banking services for some entities. Banco Santander acts “in accordance with its perception of risk,” a representative said.

“We now have to rely on using accounts outside Portugal to run the exchange,” Criptoloja’s founder Pedro Borges admitted. That’s despite his company becoming the first to obtain a license from the central bank last year. Criptoloja has always informed authorities of suspicious operations and followed all compliance procedures, he pointed out. Mind the Coin’s Pedro Guimaraes added:

While there is no official explanation, some banks just tell us they don’t want to work with crypto companies. It’s almost impossible to start a crypto business in Portugal right now.

Three out of five coin trading platforms authorized by Banco de Portugal have had their accounts shut down this year. While it’s unclear whether the trend is affecting other companies in the sector, it could be a sign of a toughening environment in Portugal, which lured crypto enthusiasts with its zero-percent tax on crypto gains, affordable living costs, and mild climate.

Tags in this story

Account, account closures, accounts, Bank, bank accounts, banks, Crypto, crypto companies, crypto exchanges, crypto firms, crypto platforms, Cryptocurrencies, Cryptocurrency, Exchanges, Portugal, Portuguese

Do you expect bank account closures to affect other crypto businesses in Portugal? Tell us in the comments section below.

Lubomir Tassev

Lubomir Tassev is a journalist from tech-savvy Eastern Europe who likes Hitchens’s quote: “Being a writer is what I am, rather than what I do.” Besides crypto, blockchain and fintech, international politics and economics are two other sources of inspiration.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, RaffMaster

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More Popular News

In Case You Missed It



Source link

NiceHash

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*